Twitter Tweets about DNS as of February 05, 2010

ciscojsolse: HTTP to Webex.com Total RTT: 1814 milliseconds ( DNS RTT: 41 ms , TCP Connection RTT: 135 ms , HTTP Transaction RTT: 1638 ms )
2010-02-05 · Reply
TeslaSystem: RT: @HarisCOfficial: There you go : http://bit.ly/aAN2Wl the super duper DNS Project Remix!..Out on promo now:) Enjoy http://bit.ly/aBHxbt
2010-02-05 · Reply
HarisCOfficial: There you go : http://bit.ly/aAN2Wl the super duper DNS Project Remix!..Out on promo now:) Enjoy http://bit.ly/aBHxbt
2010-02-05 · Reply
agungridwan: shares **WARNING: POSSIBLE DNS SPOOFING DETECTED!** Kata2nya serem, tp penyelesaiannya ga rumit2 amat. http://plurk.com/p/3nhoc0
2010-02-05 · Reply
djdiaz: Google proposes extension to DNS http://bit.ly/aZTzob | Has some potentially undesirable censorship implications.
2010-02-05 · Reply
2010-02-05 · Reply
alienMalware: b90a8b2ef0bedee93b24287a24242729 with 6 rules - HTTP UserAgent DNS Thinstall 2.4x - 2.5x -> Jitit Software
2010-02-05 · Reply
ciscojsolse: HTTP to Twitter.com Total RTT: 1492 milliseconds ( DNS RTT: 43 ms , TCP Connection RTT: 121 ms , HTTP Transaction RTT: 1328 ms )
2010-02-05 · Reply
bokurtu: @ecenursabak DNS ayarlar?.
2010-02-05 · Reply
dlarmeir: Fixed some DNS woes I had on my production box. I accidentally used a serial from the past and it caused my DNS resolution to go wacky.
2010-02-05 · Reply
vickyjo: @cazm They're aren't many that support .ltd.uk names, moving your DNS servers is straight forward - I had to do that for my .ly domain
2010-02-05 · Reply
foxmachia: RT @livid: ?????? Twitter?? DNS ???????????????
2010-02-05 · Reply
ccojano: DNS Query/Response RTT Report Google DNS(8.8.8.8):105 msec!!Nearest DNS:7 msec!!
2010-02-05 · Reply
TigrisUr: DNS Jumper 1.0.3: Egy korábbi cikkemben volt már szó arról, hogy a internet-kapcsolatunk sokszor nem a szolgáltató... http://bit.ly/cRunh7
2010-02-05 · Reply
jorgeespira: Vaya, veo que en la principal compañía de telecomunicaciones de España siguen sin tener claras las cosas ¿tan difícil es cambiar unas DNS?
2010-02-05 · Reply